00000nam 2200000za 4500 9.840804 CaOODSP 20221107151931 cr ||||||||||| 170801s2003 onc |o f|0| 0 eng d CaOODSP eng eng fre n-cn--- CS11-617/2003-6E-PDF Chen, Zhao-Guo, 1943- Comparison of benchmarking methods with and without survey error modelling [electronic resource] / by Zhao-Guo Chen and Ka Ho Wu. [Ottawa] : Statistics Canada, 2003. 23 p. Working paper ; 2003-6 Digitized edition from print [produced by Statistics Canada]. "BSMD-2003-006E." "November 2003." Includes bibliographic references. "In this paper, we will show the relationship among three types of benchmarking methods in the literature, namely the Denton (original and modified), the regression, and the signal extraction methods. Assuming the survey error series follows an AR(1) model, by simulation, we investigate the impacts of mis-specification of the model on the benchmarking predictions based on the criterion of minimizing root-mean-squared error of prediction. It is concluded that the survey error modelling procedure proposed by Chen and Wu (2000, 2001) may lead to results as good as those obtained from using the true survey error models"--Abstract. Abstract also in French. gccst Statistical analysis gccst Methodology gccst Surveys Wu, Ka Ho Eden. Canada. Statistics Canada. Methodology Branch. Working paper (Statistics Canada. Methodology Branch) 2003-6 (CaOODSP)9.834763 PDF 3.26 MB https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/statcan/11-613/CS11-617-2003-6-eng.pdf 11-617-XPE no. 0306