<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><marc:collection xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <marc:record>
    <marc:leader>00000nam  2200000za 4500</marc:leader>
    <marc:controlfield tag="001">9.840895</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="003">CaOODSP</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="005">20221107151945</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="008">170802s1993    onc    |o    f|0| 0 eng d</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">CaOODSP</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">eng</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">eng</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">fre</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">n-cn---</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="086" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">CS11-620/93-7E-PDF</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Kovar, J. G.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Jackknife variance estimation under imputation </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="h">[electronic resource] : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">an empirical investigation / </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">by J. G. Kovar and E. J. Chen.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">[Ottawa] : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Statistics Canada, </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">1993.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">15 p.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Working paper ; </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="v">93-7</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Digitized edition from print [produced by Statistics Canada].</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"Working Paper No. METH-93-007E."</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"June 1993."</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Includes bibliographic references.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"Imputation is a common technique employed by survey-taking organizations in order to address the problem of nonresponse. While in most of the cases the resulting completed data sets provide good estimates of means and totals, the corresponding variances are often grossly underestimated. A number of methods to remedy this problem exists, but most of them depend on the sampling design and the imputation method. On the other hand, the multiple imputation technique is data storage and time intensive. Recently, Rao and Shao (1992) have proposed a unified jackknife approach to variance estimation of imputed data sets. The present paper explores this technique empirically, using a real population of businesses, under a simple random sampling design and a uniform nonresponse mechanism. Extensions to stratified multistage sample designs are considered and comparisons to the multiple imputation technique are presented. Finally, the performance of the proposed variance estimator under non-uniform response mechanisms is briefly investigated"--Abstract.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Abstract also in French.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Methodology</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Statistical analysis</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Surveys</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Chen, E. J.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="710" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Canada. </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Statistics Canada. </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Methodology Branch.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="830" ind1="#" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Working paper (Statistics Canada. Methodology Branch)</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="v">93-7</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="w">(CaOODSP)9.834763</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="q">PDF</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="s">1.90 MB</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="u">https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/statcan/11-613/CS11-620-93-7-eng.pdf</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="986" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">11-620E no. 93-07</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
  </marc:record>
</marc:collection>
