<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><marc:collection xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <marc:record>
    <marc:leader>00000nam  2200000za 4500</marc:leader>
    <marc:controlfield tag="001">9.841015</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="003">CaOODSP</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="005">20221107152002</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="008">170803s1995    onc    |o    f|0| 0 eng d</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">CaOODSP</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">eng</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">n-cn---</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="086" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">CS11-619/95-5E-PDF</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Beebakhee, Roanna M.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2">
      <marc:subfield code="a">A comparison of two variance estimation techniques </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="h">[electronic resource] : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">the jackknife method and the linearized jackknife method / </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">Roanna M. Beebakhee.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">[Ottawa] : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Statistics Canada, </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">1995.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">25 p.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Working paper ; </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="v">95-5</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Digitized edition from print [produced by Statistics Canada].</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"HSMD-95-005-E."</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"June 1995."</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Includes bibliographic references.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"The jackknife method of variance estimation is used extensively for surveys with complex designs. Although it has desirable statistical properties, it is computer intensive resulting in relatively high costs. In addition, when it is used for estimating the variance of regression estimators under a stratified multi-stage cluster design, it requires the calculation of matrix inverses which has the potential of generating computational degeneracies. An alternative method, known as the linearized jackknife method has been proposed and its theoretical properties have been investigated by Yung and Rao (1995). An empirical study has been undertaken which applies both variance methods to a number of household surveys conducted by Statistics Canada. Further, the linearized jackknife variance method and the customary Taylor linearization variance method are compared to the jackknife method"--Abstract.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Statistical analysis</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Methodology</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Surveys</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="710" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Canada. </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Statistics Canada. </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Methodology Branch.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="830" ind1="#" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Working paper (Statistics Canada. Methodology Branch)</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="v">95-5</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="w">(CaOODSP)9.834763</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="q">PDF</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="s">3.00MB</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="u">https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/statcan/11-613/CS11-619-95-5-eng.pdf</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="986" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">11-619E no. 95-05</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
  </marc:record>
</marc:collection>
